The supplier directory

Structures and materials

6 companies in this category, each profiled from public sources with every line naming where it came from.

The buyer's guide19 August 2026

How to buy structures and materials

Every structural purchase answers two questions before it answers price: who is responsible for the design, and by what route the finished article is allowed onto an aircraft.

This is the parent guide for the physical part of an aircraft: fuselage and wing structures, machined parts, composites, castings and forgings, fasteners, landing gear, seals and bearings, transparencies, surface treatments and the metal itself. The guides beneath it cover the process questions each of those trades turns on. This one covers what they share, which is that a structural purchase is a purchase of responsibility as much as of hardware.

Decide who owns the design before you ask for a price

Build to print and design responsible are different businesses with different insurance, different engineering staff and different prices. Say which one you are buying in the request for quotation, and say who owns the tooling, the model, the fixtures and the inspection programme when the relationship ends. The second question is what route puts the part on an aircraft. A person who knows a replacement or modification article is likely to be installed on a type certificated product may not produce it unless it comes through one of the routes the rule lists: under a type certificate, under an FAA production approval, as a standard part made to a government or industry specification, as a commercial part, produced by an owner or operator for their own product, fabricated by an appropriately rated certificate holder and consumed in a repair, or approved in another manner by the FAA.2 The same section stops a producer outside the first two routes from representing the part as suitable for installation on a type certificated product.2 A shop can be excellent and still be on the wrong route for what you need, and that conversation costs nothing before the order and a great deal after it.

The prime's quality system reaches into yours

A production certificate holder must run a quality system that controls design data and documents and that controls suppliers, including procedures ensuring supplier-provided articles conform to the holder's requirements and a process by which suppliers report articles that do not.1 That is the mechanism behind every source approval, every flowdown clause and every audit a tier-two shop complains about. Read your flowdowns before you sign them. Ask which requirements you are expected to pass to your own subcontractors, particularly for the special processes covered in this directory's coatings and composites guides, and ask what your customer's approved processor list allows.

Materials carry rules of their own

Defense work restricts where certain metals may be melted. The specialty metals clause defines the class by chemistry, covering specified steels, nickel and iron-nickel alloys, cobalt alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, and zirconium alloys, and it reaches mill products, forgings and castings, magnets and fasteners, with defined exceptions for commercially available off-the-shelf items.3 Ask how melt source appears in the certification package and who checks it. Drawings also call out specifications by number and revision, and defense standards are searchable in the government's own register, where a document shows as active, inactive or cancelled with its dates.4 Quoting against a cancelled revision is a common and expensive mistake.

Questions that sort suppliers

Ask what proportion of the work is done in house and who performs the rest. Ask for a first article package from a comparable part, and read the material certifications back to the mill. Ask what the shop does when a dimension is out of tolerance and the schedule is short. Ask what rate it has actually run on a part like yours, not what the machine list implies.

The companies below are listed on public facts, each with its source linked.

Sources, in the order cited

  1. 1Electronic Code of Federal Regulations · 14 CFR Part 21 Subpart G, Production Certificates
  2. 2Electronic Code of Federal Regulations · 14 CFR 21.9, Replacement and modification articles
  3. 3Acquisition.gov · DFARS 252.225-7009, Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals
  4. 4Defense Logistics Agency · ASSIST Quick Search, the defense standardization document register
Reuben Mann, Editor · Four sources

Suppliers in this category

6 companies

Airbus Helicopters

OEM · GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, USA

Makes: BLADE, ROTOR, MAIN

  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FF0000389, $383,663 from Department of Homeland Security: PROCUREMENT OF VARIOUS SPARE PARTS USED ON THE MH-65E AIRCRAFT. CLASS DETERMINATION FOR NONAVAILABILITY ARTICLES IAW FAR 25.103(B)(1) APPLIES TO THIS ACTION, BAA EXCEPTION MTF IS IN THE FILE. USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FF0000422, $803,265 from Department of Homeland Security: PROCUREMENT OF VARIOUS SPARE PARTS USED ON THE MH-65E AIRCRAFT. CLASS DETERMINATION FOR NONAVAILABILITY ARTICLES IAW FAR 25.103(B)(1) APPLIES TO THIS ACTION, BAA EXCEPTION MTF IS IN THE FILE. USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FF0000436, $374,498 from Department of Homeland Security: DELIVERY ORDER OF VARIOUS SPARES TO BE USED ON USCG MH-65 AIRCRAFT. CLASS DETERMINATION NONAVAILABILITY ARTICLES IAW FAR 25.103(B)(1) APPLIES TO THIS ACTION, BAA EXCEPTION MTF IS IN THE FILE. USAspending.gov award data, the entry

Makes: UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS) · Intelligent Drone Ignitions To Manage Fires

  • Contract award: Federal contract award 140D0426F0717, $315,886 from Department of the Interior: DRONE AMPLIFIED, LNC BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT CALL ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS) USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: National Science Foundation SBIR/STTR award 2019, contract 1843735: SBIR Phase I: Intelligent Drone Ignitions To Manage Fires SBIR and STTR award data
  • Contract award: National Science Foundation SBIR/STTR award 2020, contract 2025871: SBIR Phase II: Intelligent Drone Ignitions To Manage Fires SBIR and STTR award data

GE Aviation Systems LLC

Wilmington, US-DE, US

Makes: ACTUATOR ASSY

  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FC0000035, $2.9M from Department of Homeland Security: PROCUREMENT OF VARIOUS PARTS IN SUPPORT OF THE R391 PROPELLER ASSEMBLY TO BE USED ON UNITED STATES COAST GUARD HC-130J AIRCRAFT. USAspending.gov award data, the entry
  • Contract award: Federal subcontract 14S56593, $1.7M under GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY: AVIATION ENGINE HARDWARE USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: Federal subcontract 2590685-06, $2.5M under THE BOEING COMPANY: SYSTEMS USAspending.gov award data

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Columbus, US-OH, US

Makes: TAIL ROTOR SERVO ASSEMBLIES TO BE UTILIZED ON USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT · FABRICATED PLASTICS · ADAPTORS, COUPLERS

  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FR0000114, $445,138 from Department of Homeland Security: PURCHASE OF TAIL ROTOR SERVO ASSEMBLIES TO BE UTILIZED ON USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT. USAspending.gov award data, the entry
  • Contract award: Federal subcontract 2621205-01, $1.3M under BOEING COMPANY, THE: COMMON AEROSPACE COMMODITIES USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: Federal subcontract 2621205-02, $475,020 under BOEING COMPANY, THE: COMMON AEROSPACE COMMODITIES USAspending.gov award data

Makes: FATIGUE LIFE ANALYSIS (FLA) OF THE USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT · OVERHAUL OF ROTARY WING AND ROTARY RUDDER BLADES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT

  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FJ0000105, $2.8M from Department of Homeland Security: PURCHASE OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS. USAspending.gov award data
  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FJ0000117, $3.0M from Department of Homeland Security: OVERHAUL OF ROTARY WING AND ROTARY RUDDER BLADES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT. USAspending.gov award data, the entry
  • Contract award: Federal contract award 70Z03826FJ0000122, $9.7M from Department of Homeland Security: FATIGUE LIFE ANALYSIS (FLA) OF THE USCG MH-60T AIRCRAFT. USAspending.gov award data, the entry

In the record

The whole record